Why do BCRs prohibit the transfer of employee names to telecom providers?

Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) are internal policies adopted by multinational companies to govern the transfer of personal data across borders, particularly when it comes to compliance with data protection laws like the GDPR. They set out how personal data is managed within the organization to ensure that adequate data protection standards are maintained.

The correct focus here is on why BCRs are designed primarily for intra-organizational transfers. BCRs establish a framework for data sharing within the organization itself, meaning that personal data remains under the organization’s control and is not subject to the additional regulatory scrutiny that comes with transferring data to external parties. This is why BCRs prohibit the transfer of employee names to telecom providers. Transferring such personal data to a third-party telecom provider would mean moving it outside the controlled environment governed by BCRs, thereby necessitating different safeguards and compliance measures that go beyond what BCRs provide.

In contrast, the other options miss this crucial aspect of BCRs. They either suggest that BCRs are about third-party transfers, mischaracterize them as providing safeguards applicable to all scenarios, or incorrectly imply that BCRs can govern external data transfers without additional contractual measures. Understanding the primary function of BCRs helps clarify why they